Warning: include(/home/nascent/public_html/wp-content/themes/organic_structure/sidebar_left.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/nascent/public_html/wp-content/themes/organic_structure/tag.php on line 5

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/nascent/public_html/wp-content/themes/organic_structure/sidebar_left.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php') in /home/nascent/public_html/wp-content/themes/organic_structure/tag.php on line 5

A Quick Thought on Euthyphro

Socrates’ younger friend, Euthy­phro, has under­taken pros­e­cu­tion of his father for mur­der­ing a slave (or so Euthy­phro says); that is, his father bound and tied a field laborer who, in a fit of drunken rage, killed a domes­tic ser­vant. In this con­di­tion the field laborer was thrown into a ditch until word could be fetched from an Athen­ian diviner as to how to han­dle the laborer. While wait­ing for word, the slave died. It is with this back­ground that the well-known Euthy­phro has been formulated:

Socrates: Then, my friend, I remark with sur­prise that you have not answered the ques­tion which I have asked. For I cer­tainly did not ask you to tell me what action is both pious and impi­ous: but now it would seem that what is loved by the gods is also hated by them. And there­fore, Euthy­phro, in thus chastis­ing your father you may very … (Read more)

Is all suffering meaningless?

The more I think about it, the more I real­ize that it isn’t the case. Which forces me to con­clude that any­one who says that “suf­fer­ing is incom­pat­i­ble with a benev­o­lent God” hasn’t given suf­fer­ing proper con­sid­er­a­tion. It seems that the prob­lem is we aren’t con­tent with not know­ing. God’s answer to Job wasn’t enough! Job should have insisted. Hmm, gives me a few good thoughts… And by the way, Mak­ing Sense of Suf­fer­ing (which I’ll review soon) is an excel­lent book, well worth read­ing.… (Read more)

Arguments from evil

One thing I never under­stood about the argu­ment from evil is how peo­ple came to view it as an argu­ment against the exis­tence of God, or at least against the exis­tence of a per­sonal and all lov­ing God. My con­fu­sion over this argu­ment isn’t sim­ply because if it’s for­mu­lated incor­rectly, you must assume what you’re try­ing to dis­prove (an objec­tive moral stan­dard with which to dif­fer­en­ti­ate between good and evil, nec­es­sar­ily requir­ing God). My con­fu­sion over this argu­ment is because ‘evil’ as a thing from which peo­ple argue, if they argue from nat­u­ral­is­tic pre­sup­po­si­tions, sim­ply doesn’t exist. Whether it’s gra­tu­itous evil and suf­fer­ing (ani­mal or oth­er­wise) or sim­ply bad actions. Epi­cu­rus was wish­fully think­ing, there is no evil in his argu­ment to remove God.… (Read more)