Warning: include(/home/nascent/public_html/wp-content/themes/organic_structure/sidebar_left.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/nascent/public_html/wp-content/themes/organic_structure/tag.php on line 5

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/nascent/public_html/wp-content/themes/organic_structure/sidebar_left.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php') in /home/nascent/public_html/wp-content/themes/organic_structure/tag.php on line 5

Genesis 19:1–11

The Bible and Homo­sex­u­al­ity — Sodom and Gomor­rah

It is claimed that : Nowhere in scrip­ture is homo­sex­u­al­ity listed as the sin which con­demned Sodom

Gen­e­sis 19 1:11

1Now the two angels came to Sodom in the evening as Lot was sit­ting in the gate of Sodom When Lot saw them, he rose to meet them and bowed down with his face to the ground.
2And he said, “Now behold, my lords, please turn aside into your servant’s house, and spend the night, and wash your feet; then you may rise early and go on your way.” They said how­ever, “No, but we shall spend the night in the square.“
3Yet he urged them strongly, so they turned aside to him and entered his house; and he pre­pared a feast for them, and baked unleav­ened bread, and they ate.
4Before they lay down, the men (Read more)

The Bible and Homosexuality: Introduction

There’s been a lot of renewed dis­cus­sion (read: debate) over what the Bible says con­cern­ing homo­sex­u­al­ity, espe­cially where the “clob­ber verses” (listed below) are con­cerned. As it’s begin­ning to come up time and time again, I fig­ured I would exam­ine the clob­ber verses, both views for and against, and see if we, or I, can con­clude where exactly the bible stands in regard to this issue (how­ever obvi­ous it may be for some on both sides). I’ll prob­a­bly get one post in this series writ­ten every week, but we’ll see for sure what happens.

So then, this just serves as the (very) brief introduction.

Post Series: The Bible and Homosexuality

Part 1: Intro­duc­tion
Part 2: Gen­e­sis 19:1–11
Part 3: Leviti­cus 18:22
Part 4: Leviti­cus 20:13
Part 5: Romans 1:26–27
Part 6: 1 Corinthi­ans 6:9–10
Part 7: 1 Tim­o­thy 1:9–10
Part 8: Jude 1:7

Con­clu­sion

**Dis­claimer: I want to make clear that (Read more)

What does monogamy have to do with it?

For the past few days I’ve been think­ing about this view that Chris­tians can be prac­tic­ing homo­sex­u­als as long as that prac­tice is kept within a ‘long term, monog­a­mous, lov­ing rela­tion­ship’.  There are a cou­ple things I have a hard time under­stand­ing with this sort of argu­ment. The first thing is that it seems to me as if we have bib­li­cal command’s (i.e., Gen­e­sis 2:20–24) being ignored and fol­lowed at the same time. In the case of Gen­e­sis most of us would have no prob­lem with the ‘long term, monog­a­mous, lov­ing rela­tion­ship’ part. Yet at the same time a lot of us would have a prob­lem with the real­ity that it men­tions, quite explic­itly, that such a rela­tion­ship is sup­posed to be het­ero­sex­ual. We might say that just because it doesn’t men­tion homo­sex­ual rela­tion­ships, doesn’t mean they’re for­bid­den. In the same breath, we would not point out that just because(Read more)

Say what?!

Tony Jones has responded to the sort of argu­ment I used in my pre­vi­ous reply to him and the response has me scratch­ing my head.  The core of Tony’s response is that first of all, every­thing is rel­a­tive (this isn’t sur­pris­ing). Sec­ond of all that the Bib­li­cal nar­ra­tive as such doesn’t mat­ter. It doesn’t mat­ter that the cre­ation nar­ra­tive only men­tioned the cre­ation of man and woman for each other. It also doesn’t mat­ter that Jesus affirmed this in the New Tes­ta­ment; the book of Matthew and the Ser­mon on the Mount and in other places. Tony Jones equated the lack of men­tion of bisex­u­als, homo­sex­u­als, her­maph­ro­dites etc., in Gen­e­sis and the say­ings of Jesus with the fact that Jesus cast demons named Legion out of a man instead of call­ing this man’s ‘prob­lem’ schiz­o­phre­nia. That there­fore, in the same way that a schiz­o­phrenic isn’t excluded from the king­dom of … (Read more)

It’s Genetic!

When Chris­tians involve them­selves in dis­cus­sions of homo­sex­u­al­ity, usu­ally a cou­ple things hap­pen: (1) there is a fail­ure to dis­tin­guish between homo­sex­u­al­ity as a dis­po­si­tion and homo­sex­ual acts and (2) peo­ple view it as some sort of argu­ment to assert that, since homo­sex­u­al­ity must have a genetic ori­gin, it’s accept­able and an ortho­dox read­ing of Scrip­ture on the ‘homo­sex­ual issue’ is errant. Well to answer, (1) Scrip­ture con­demns homo­sex­ual acts and thus (2) appeal­ing to one’s genes is nei­ther here nor there.

To begin, a video by Ravi Zacharias on the accep­tance of homo­sex­u­al­ity within Chris­tian­ity: is it pos­si­ble to live a Chris­t­ian life and be homo­sex­ual? As well, William Lane Craig’s pod­cast on how one can be Chris­t­ian and homo­sex­ual:

What many Chris­tians will dis­agree with (at least in my expe­ri­ence) is this notion that there should be a dis­tinc­tion cre­ated between homo­sex­u­al­ity and homo­sex­ual acts. Surely, they … (Read more)