Warning: include(/home/nascent/public_html/wp-content/themes/organic_structure/sidebar_left.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/nascent/public_html/wp-content/themes/organic_structure/tag.php on line 5

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/nascent/public_html/wp-content/themes/organic_structure/sidebar_left.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php') in /home/nascent/public_html/wp-content/themes/organic_structure/tag.php on line 5

God’s Will and Journies

The will of God is not a des­ti­na­tion but a jour­ney. When you don’t hear if you should go left or right, its usu­ally because he is say­ing: come this way as he points to himself.

I find myself ques­tion­ing what the above means. Per­haps what is meant is this: “The will of God is not a des­ti­na­tion in itself, but a jour­ney towards God and who God desires us to be.” In this way the ‘will of God’ becomes both a jour­ney and a des­ti­na­tion. A des­ti­na­tion in two senses. The first is some­thing akin to ‘stops along the way’ — the ‘will of God’ places us in par­tic­u­lar cir­cum­stances at par­tic­u­lar times. The sec­ond is in the sense of a final des­ti­na­tion, God. Thus I can see what is meant, though it is clouded by what is said (and rather poorly expressed). If some other sense is meant, … (Read more)

Relevance, but What of the Message?

What wor­ries me to a great extent is the drive with which future church lead­ers are trained to be rel­e­vant to cul­ture, and in the process for­get­ting about the mes­sage they are sup­posed to be rel­e­vant with. The prob­lem isn’t that the church is irrel­e­vant, or that the pre­sen­ta­tion is irrel­e­vant (nec­es­sar­ily). The prob­lem is that the church has retreated from cul­ture. An inabil­ity to think crit­i­cally will do the church in…… (Read more)

Snap-shot Beliefs

Sen­sa­tion­al­ism is unde­ni­ably one of the marks of our cul­ture. It would appear that not only do we all want atten­tion, but we want to make it seem as if the things we are get­ting atten­tion for, are extra­or­di­nary. Read­ing Pas­cal last night:

Van­ity is so anchored in the human heart that a sol­dier, a cadet, a cook, a kitchen porter boasts, and wants to have admir­ers, and even philoso­phers want them, and those who write against them want the pres­tige of hav­ing writ­ten well, and those who read them want the pres­tige of hav­ing read them, and I, writ­ing this, per­haps have this desire, and those who will read this…1

“And those who will read this…” will want recog­ni­tion for hav­ing read and quoted Pas­cal. I sus­pect that in my case, this is where vanity ends.

I came across this thought think­ing over book titles such as The God Delu­sion(Read more)

Intellectuals and “the church”

(This may be thought of as an expan­sion upon an ear­lier post– The Two Tasks of Evan­ge­lism)

There is a prob­lem with the “mod­ern” church — it’s gen­er­ally anti-intellectual (dis­claimer: in my expe­ri­ence). It has thrown aside his­tory, tra­di­tion, and many of the great thinkers of the early and medieval church, I imag­ine either because they were from the “old world,” or they were “Catholic”. This seems espe­cially true of Charis­matic groups, where there is so much focus on “expe­ri­ence” and “the Spirit” that any men­tion of “logic” or “ratio­nal think­ing” — per­haps even worse, “phi­los­o­phy” — is met with all forms of oppo­si­tion. The most com­mon objec­tion to these words being the knee-jerk reac­tion, “unless you’re sub­mit­ted to the Spirit, then you’re use­less!” Frankly, I don’t know any (Chris­t­ian) intel­lec­tu­als who would argue that they shouldn’t by sub­mit­ted to God. The reac­tion is reveal­ing — for some rea­son, … (Read more)

I’m Frustrated!

I have to admit, I’m frus­trated. And this is where I’m going to express my frus­tra­tion, to my great dis­may… and frustration.

I’m frus­trated because I’m in an envi­ron­ment I wouldn’t have cho­sen to be in, out­side of my wife and I being called to where we are (in this case, Que­bec). I’m frus­trated because the peo­ple can be dif­fi­cult, the gov­ern­ment is non­sen­si­cal (they are in the process of try­ing to force my wife to re-take her maiden name), and I don’t really have a choice in the mat­ter. In some ways this fol­lows up my pre­vi­ous post “But why, God?” with “What are you think­ing, God?” I think a large part of “things” is that remind­ing myself that “God is in con­trol” (other’s remind­ing me of this as well) isn’t a com­fort­ing — as I sus­pect it should be — thought. It can be a dif­fi­cult thing com­ing … (Read more)

Genesis 19:1–11

The Bible and Homo­sex­u­al­ity — Sodom and Gomor­rah

It is claimed that : Nowhere in scrip­ture is homo­sex­u­al­ity listed as the sin which con­demned Sodom

Gen­e­sis 19 1:11

1Now the two angels came to Sodom in the evening as Lot was sit­ting in the gate of Sodom When Lot saw them, he rose to meet them and bowed down with his face to the ground.
2And he said, “Now behold, my lords, please turn aside into your servant’s house, and spend the night, and wash your feet; then you may rise early and go on your way.” They said how­ever, “No, but we shall spend the night in the square.“
3Yet he urged them strongly, so they turned aside to him and entered his house; and he pre­pared a feast for them, and baked unleav­ened bread, and they ate.
4Before they lay down, the men (Read more)

The Bible and Homosexuality: Introduction

There’s been a lot of renewed dis­cus­sion (read: debate) over what the Bible says con­cern­ing homo­sex­u­al­ity, espe­cially where the “clob­ber verses” (listed below) are con­cerned. As it’s begin­ning to come up time and time again, I fig­ured I would exam­ine the clob­ber verses, both views for and against, and see if we, or I, can con­clude where exactly the bible stands in regard to this issue (how­ever obvi­ous it may be for some on both sides). I’ll prob­a­bly get one post in this series writ­ten every week, but we’ll see for sure what happens.

So then, this just serves as the (very) brief introduction.

Post Series: The Bible and Homosexuality

Part 1: Intro­duc­tion
Part 2: Gen­e­sis 19:1–11
Part 3: Leviti­cus 18:22
Part 4: Leviti­cus 20:13
Part 5: Romans 1:26–27
Part 6: 1 Corinthi­ans 6:9–10
Part 7: 1 Tim­o­thy 1:9–10
Part 8: Jude 1:7

Con­clu­sion

**Dis­claimer: I want to make clear that (Read more)

Mohler: Christian, Muslim Dialogue

Justin Tay­lor has posted a link on his blog to a pre­sen­ta­tion on Islam by Dr. Al Mohler. A good intro­duc­tion to the Chris­t­ian / Mus­lim dia­logue, Mohler’s talk is described as an exam­i­na­tion of “some of the fun­da­men­tal ways in which Islam and Chris­tian­ity are at odds with one another, and how Chris­tians and local churches can best think through their impli­ca­tions for life and min­istry.” Hav­ing lis­tened to it last night, I can say that it’s very infor­ma­tive and a worth the lis­ten if you’re inter­ested in the Chris­t­ian / Mus­lim dynamic.

You can find the pre­sen­ta­tion here.… (Read more)

Stretched Illustrations?

(**Spoil­ers below**)

Some times I won­der how peo­ple arrive at cer­tain inter­pre­ta­tions of “art”. Strangely enough, I came across this arti­cle which sets about using Avatar  as a metaphor for “emer­gent evan­ge­lism”. The main thrust of the arti­cle is that we “don’t bring God to the other,” rather, that “we find God in the other”–Jake Sully is the per­fect exam­ple of this sort of mind­set, or so it’s claimed. I don’t want to exam­ine the entire arti­cle, only one paragraph.

Evan­ge­lism is a two-way street

This is where the Avatar movie is a great metaphor for what evan­ge­lism could and should become. Although Jake Sully entered the Na’vi world (Pan­dora) ini­tially with an agenda in mind, he got to appre­ci­ate their way of life, its beauty so much so that he wanted to become part of it. Even­tu­ally his pres­ence there really helped to save them. But it was some­thing organic. … (Read more)

Mystery and discontent

Over the course of this past week I had a dis­cus­sion with a friend who men­tioned that he noticed quite a few “well edu­cated” Chris­tians mov­ing from a Protes­tant foun­da­tion to a more “tra­di­tional” foun­da­tion, by which I mean Angli­can­ism and even the Roman Catholic Church. It strikes me as com­pa­ra­ble to — for instance — when a dis­grun­tled Evan­gel­i­cal chooses to iden­tify him­self as a mem­ber of the emer­gent church in response to a lack of authen­tic­ity in one’s faith (as I under­stand one of the major rea­sons peo­ple are part of the emer­gent church). At this point I agree with my friends obser­va­tion as I’ve had some expe­ri­ences with it myself; I would ask  why some of us are choos­ing to affil­i­ate with denom­i­na­tions (or here­sies, for those who are vehe­mently anti-Catholic) that in recent years have come to be frowned upon as need­lessly tra­di­tional, the­o­log­i­cally errant and … (Read more)