Inner Conflicts
I find writing publicly like this to be a tad strange. In a way, knowing this is public forces me to write, which allows for both an improvement in my ability to write, and the gaining of knowledge. I’m quite certain that if I were writing in a journal, I would be writing for very different reasons (and thus, neither improve my ability to write, or learn). And yet at the same time I seem to constantly remind myself, ‘what’s the point?’ The ‘point,’ which I agreed upon with myself, is simply to write and learn. I don’t know quite near enough to make any serious contributions to anything, and so I don’t attempt it. Why, when I know that this is more for me than anything else, do I feel so much opposition from within myself? When I started writing I didn’t know, but now that I’ve finished — and edited this line — I do. At first I might think, “you’re 23, you should know much more than you do — why are you bothering with this?” but then I might think, “you’re only 23, you’re young still and have much to learn — why are you doing this?” I criticize myself for not knowing enough, or for having to learn — even though this point of this whole exercise is learning.
I suppose that in a certain way I muddle over “what’s the point?” My writing ability may greatly improve, but there will always be others who are far better. I may greatly “increase in knowledge,” but again, there will be others who know far more. I might become wiser, but never to the point of considering myself “wise”. I might become “great” at what I do, but there are others who have been greater, and there will be others who will be greater. The further I examine myself, and think about the desires I possess, the more I learn that I’m either virtuous, or sinful.
I have the awful habit of comparing myself with others. I determined at a young age — after some very poor experiences with my peers — that I would know more than them, be smarter and wiser and more intelligent than them. The “problem” was that for a few years, I was home schooled. During that time I was constantly being reminded that academically, I would be grades behind my peers. The “friends” I had tended to remind me of that. I remember taking a mandatory test in grade 8 to see where I ranked compared to other grade 8 students. My reading comprehension level was that of an undergraduate student, but in every other area I was graded at a “grade 3 / grade 4″ level. Again, it only made me more determined and in any case, when I did attend high school I discovered that I was ahead — quite ahead — of my peers. But “it’”s a funny thing, you never feel like you’ve done enough. Now I am in university, and it isn’t my peers that I compare myself with, but professors. Talk about unrealistic expectations.
“It” being pride, hence my either being virtuous (Aristotle) or sinful (Christian teaching). I’m quite inclined to agree that it’s a sin. I wonder why I’m wise enough to know the cause, but not to overcome it. It’s a funny thing, that pride, showing up where I didn’t expect it.


The last statement reminds of a previous thought about Solomon, who in all his wisdom, still screwed up and was unable to heed his own wisdom.
FWIW, I can see a great gift in the issues you speak. Harnessed well it can be used to motivate and grow, but every gift is a two-edged sword.
Without meaning to sound full of myself, I think I’m beginning to understand why Solomon always seemed to return to “all is vanity”. On further introspection I’m led to consider two things specifically: 1) Ecclesiastes was an incredibly personal book, and 2) That much like Solomon, a lot of my thinking tends to be focused around what I can do to solve an issue, rather than on how I should be leaning on God.
You know, I think it’s making me realize just how deeply ingrained we are with sin. That even if we could say to ourselves, “I haven’t done anything sinful today,” we would be horrified to examine how and why we operate.
Your last paragraph — Total Depravity perhaps
? As we had discussed elsewhere, this is perhaps why I am fairly convinced of our evolutionary origins — we are struggling against our base nature of selfishness. God gave us an opportunity to commune with him by his revelation of Himself to our ancestors. Honestly, I don’t think we even had a chance of not screwing up what God gave us. That certainly is how it played out.
I await the pitchforks and burning torches.
BTW, I preferred the old layout and fonts. The new banner image is nice though. Is that from your new locale?
Thought I’d try some new things, still not sure what I think of it. By the way, what browser are you using? The site currently doesn’t display properly in IE. And no, the banner is a stock image.
I think that regardless of “creationist” origins of “evolutionist” origins, we didn’t have much of a chance. Curiosity in one instance, selfishness in the other. I wonder if Adam or Eve would have taken the fruit if the serpent wasn’t in the garden (or whatever the metaphor expresses). What could we say of their “trusting” God? If the very hint of “God is lying to you” made Eve question what she had been told, then what does that show of their disposition?
And in any case I just might agree with Plantinga, that a world with the incarnation is a “better” world than without.
I am almost always using Firefox.
Good to hear.