Inner Conflicts

I find writ­ing pub­licly like this to be a tad strange. In a way, know­ing this is pub­lic forces me to write, which allows for both an improve­ment in my abil­ity to write, and the gain­ing of knowl­edge. I’m quite cer­tain that if I were writ­ing in a jour­nal, I would be writ­ing for very dif­fer­ent rea­sons (and thus, nei­ther improve my abil­ity to write, or learn). And yet at the same time I seem to con­stantly remind myself, ‘what’s the point?’ The ‘point,’ which I agreed upon with myself, is sim­ply to write and learn. I don’t know quite near enough to make any seri­ous con­tri­bu­tions to any­thing, and so I don’t attempt it. Why, when I know that this is more for me than any­thing else, do I feel so much oppo­si­tion from within myself? When I started writ­ing I didn’t know, but now that I’ve fin­ished — and edited this line — I do. At first I might think, “you’re 23, you should know much more than you do — why are you both­er­ing with this?” but then I might think, “you’re only 23, you’re young still and have much to learn — why are you doing this?” I crit­i­cize myself for not know­ing enough, or for hav­ing to learn — even though this point of this whole exer­cise is learning.

I sup­pose that in a cer­tain way I mud­dle over “what’s the point?” My writ­ing abil­ity may greatly improve, but there will always be oth­ers who are far bet­ter. I may greatly “increase in knowl­edge,” but again, there will be oth­ers who know far more. I might become wiser, but never to the point of con­sid­er­ing myself “wise”. I might become “great” at what I do, but there are oth­ers who have been greater, and there will be oth­ers who will be greater. The fur­ther I exam­ine myself, and think about the desires I pos­sess, the more I learn that I’m either vir­tu­ous, or sinful.

I have the awful habit of com­par­ing myself with oth­ers. I deter­mined at a young age — after some very poor expe­ri­ences with my peers — that I would know more than them, be smarter and wiser and more intel­li­gent than them. The “prob­lem” was that for a few years, I was home schooled. Dur­ing that time I was con­stantly being reminded that aca­d­e­m­i­cally, I would be grades behind my peers. The “friends” I had tended to remind me of that. I remem­ber tak­ing a manda­tory test in grade 8 to see where I ranked com­pared to other grade 8 stu­dents. My read­ing com­pre­hen­sion level was that of an under­grad­u­ate stu­dent, but in every other area I was graded at a “grade 3 / grade 4″ level. Again, it only made me more deter­mined and in any case, when I did attend high school I dis­cov­ered that I was ahead — quite ahead — of my peers. But “it’”s a funny thing, you never feel like you’ve done enough. Now I am in uni­ver­sity, and it isn’t my peers that I com­pare myself with, but pro­fes­sors.  Talk about unre­al­is­tic expectations.

“It” being pride, hence my either being vir­tu­ous (Aris­to­tle) or sin­ful (Chris­t­ian teach­ing). I’m quite inclined to agree that it’s a sin. I won­der why I’m wise enough to know the cause, but not to over­come it. It’s a funny thing, that pride, show­ing up where I didn’t expect it.

Comments
8 Responses to “Inner Conflicts”
  1. Ted says:

    The last state­ment reminds of a pre­vi­ous thought about Solomon, who in all his wis­dom, still screwed up and was unable to heed his own wisdom.

    FWIW, I can see a great gift in the issues you speak. Har­nessed well it can be used to moti­vate and grow, but every gift is a two-edged sword.

  2. Jeremy says:

    With­out mean­ing to sound full of myself, I think I’m begin­ning to under­stand why Solomon always seemed to return to “all is van­ity”. On fur­ther intro­spec­tion I’m led to con­sider two things specif­i­cally: 1) Eccle­si­astes was an incred­i­bly per­sonal book, and 2) That much like Solomon, a lot of my think­ing tends to be focused around what I can do to solve an issue, rather than on how I should be lean­ing on God.

    You know, I think it’s mak­ing me real­ize just how deeply ingrained we are with sin. That even if we could say to our­selves, “I haven’t done any­thing sin­ful today,” we would be hor­ri­fied to exam­ine how and why we operate.

  3. Ted says:

    Your last para­graph — Total Deprav­ity per­haps :) ? As we had dis­cussed else­where, this is per­haps why I am fairly con­vinced of our evo­lu­tion­ary ori­gins — we are strug­gling against our base nature of self­ish­ness. God gave us an oppor­tu­nity to com­mune with him by his rev­e­la­tion of Him­self to our ances­tors. Hon­estly, I don’t think we even had a chance of not screw­ing up what God gave us. That cer­tainly is how it played out.

    I await the pitch­forks and burn­ing torches. :)

  4. Ted says:

    BTW, I pre­ferred the old lay­out and fonts. The new ban­ner image is nice though. Is that from your new locale?

  5. Jeremy says:

    Thought I’d try some new things, still not sure what I think of it. By the way, what browser are you using? The site cur­rently doesn’t dis­play prop­erly in IE. And no, the ban­ner is a stock image.

  6. Jeremy says:

    I think that regard­less of “cre­ation­ist” ori­gins of “evo­lu­tion­ist” ori­gins, we didn’t have much of a chance. Curios­ity in one instance, self­ish­ness in the other. I won­der if Adam or Eve would have taken the fruit if the ser­pent wasn’t in the gar­den (or what­ever the metaphor expresses). What could we say of their “trust­ing” God? If the very hint of “God is lying to you” made Eve ques­tion what she had been told, then what does that show of their disposition?

    And in any case I just might agree with Planti­nga, that a world with the incar­na­tion is a “bet­ter” world than without.

  7. Ted says:

    I am almost always using Firefox.

  8. Jeremy says:

    Good to hear.