Inconsistent self
This is just a short thought in continuation from my post yesterday on the virtue of magnanimity. I find that there are certain feelings which are related to those of inadequacy, and I’ll call them ‘thoughts of consistency”. To give an example, this would take the form of doing or saying something early in life and then coming to disagree with that view as one grows older. Truthfully I don’t think there is anything wrong with this, and would think it rather hard to grow if not for expressing views which are allowed to evolve. Take for instance a post I wrote quite a while ago, “Response to Postmodern Biblical Authority” (it’s worth reading, so check it out). Since writing it I’ve come to read more on the subject (such as Lyotard’s books), and as a result I’ve come to better understand the argument presented. Now, this is a case where I don’t necessarily agree with my conclusion, though I wouldn’t say I still agree with my line of argument (because, as a commenter pointed out, it’s based on some misunderstandings). There may (and are) be cases where I do disagree with both my conclusion and argumentation, or conclusion but not my argumentation. The problem comes when people are expected — such as in forum discussions — to hold their view absolutely and that any change of mind is shown as some sort of weakness. What a terribly destructive attitude, I’ve been accused of it many times. Rather, these things are necessary for growth, as much as we may personally come to loathe some of the things we’ve said and done. And, in the end, if the result is a deeper understanding of God and greater wisdom, then the cost of disagreeing with yourself was well worth it. It should cause us to pause and think about how we present our views and teachings. With a proper, humble attitude, I don’t think we have as much as an issue as we often imagine.
And personally, I love growth; learning new things, “becoming wiser’. The humility it requires is well worth it.–a lot of us could do with a little more humility.
