Thoughts: The Language of Genesis
The following are my thoughts on chapter two of Should Christians Embrace Evolution? “The Language of Genesis” by Alistair McKitterick.
I just want to say first of all, that this book should probably have been called Should Christians Embrace Evolution? Biblical and Scientific Responses to Denis Alexander’s “Creation or Evolution? Do we Have to Choose?”. It is turning out to be not so much about ‘Darwinian Evolution’ as it is about Alexander’s attempt to create a synthesis between Darwinian Evolution and Christian theism. Something for me to keep in mind moving forward (as well as for anyone who may be interested in purchasing the book).
McKitterick begins with a brief word on presuppositions and how our presuppositions influence the way we interpret a text. In this case, our presuppositions influence how we interpret Genesis; certain presuppositions allow for Genesis to be more open to the possibility of an evolutionary interpretation than … (Read more)
Thoughts: Evolution and the Church
The following are my thoughts on chapter one of Should Christians Embrace Evolution? “Evolution and the Church” by Alistair Donald.
Donald begins his chapter with a brief survey of the historical relationship between Christianity and evolutionary theory, or more specifically, ‘Darwinism’. Although by no means exhaustive (Donald discusses some of the more prominent figures of the past — Lyell, Mivart, Warfield, etc.), it should prove an interesting introduction to the reader. It is of great personal interest to me as in the coming weeks I will be writing an essay on the very same topic.
Following this survey Donald wastes no time getting to the heart of the matter: the implications (for the Christian) of embracing evolution. I myself will waste no time in saying that Donald uses the terms ‘Darwinism’ and ‘evolution’ seemingly synonymously (from what I can tell). For example, the header text on page 19 reads, “the implications … (Read more)
On Words, Meaning and Implications
In the ‘debate’ between young earth creationism and theistic evolution, it is often the case that one or both sides is especially accusatory towards the other. The following is one such example:
There are obviously many who believe that evolution is the mechanism that God used to create the variety of life on this planet. However, for those of us who are serious about the supremacy of Scripture, it is essential that any apparent theological tensions that arise from this are rigorously reviewed. It would be premature to say the least to commit to a scientific position without having a clearly worked out theology that accords with it, particularly when so much of the scientific evidence does not necessitate a Darwinian explanation.1
The implication here is that theists who suggest that God used or could have used evolution as a mechanism are not serious about the supremacy of Scripture, … (Read more)
God and Evolution
Near the end of his foreword to Should Christians Embrace Evolution? (following the comments discussed in a previous post), Wayne Grudem says this of relationship between evolution and God:
…When atheists assure us that matter + evolution + 0 = all living things, and then theistic evolutionists answer, no, that matter + evolution + God = all living things, it will not take long for unbelievers to conclude that, therefore, God = 01.
What interests me most are the equations, followed by Grudem’s mention of atheists. Concerning the first equation: what does an atheist mean when he says “matter + evolution + 0 = all living things”? He means that the evolutionary process is sufficient in and of itself to produce “all living things”. But what does a theist mean when he says “matter + evolution + God = all living things”? He means that … (Read more)
Should Christians Embrace Evolution?
That is the question posed by Wayne Grudem, Norman C. Nevin, and eleven other contributing authors in Should Christians Embrace Evolution?: Biblical and Scientific Responses.1 As you may have assumed, these authors believe that Christians should not embrace evolution. But what is at stake if Christians were to embrace evolution, and the position known as ‘theistic evolution’? In his foreword, Grudem lists eight beliefs which must be adopted if evolution is accepted as true, these beliefs are contrary to Scripture and include:
- Adam and Eve were not the first human beings
- Other humans had already been trying to worship and seek God in their own way
- Adam was not specially created by God
- Eve was not specially created by God
- Not everyone can be traced back to Adam and Eve
- Adam and Eve’s sin was not the first sin
- Death was a feature of original creation
- God did not alter the natural world


Recent Comments