Book Review: Between Allah and Jesus by Peter Kreeft
Pages: 188
Publisher: Intervarsity Press
Year: 2010
Author: Peter Kreeft
Between Allah and Jesus: What Christians Can Learn from Muslims (hereafter BAJ) is a novelized dialogue between a Muslim and Christians, featuring some characters that will be familiar to those who have read Kreeft’s previous work. ‘Isa Ben Adams makes his return as the protagonist, along with Libby Rawls, “a sarcastic, sassy Black feminist ‘liberal’” (p. 13; both originally seen in A Refutation of Moral Relativism). Fr. (Father) Fesser is another familiar character from Socrates Meets Jesus, while the rest of the characters appear to be original to this book - Evan Jellema, “a very straight dutch Calvinist”, Father Heerema, “‘Isa’s kindly, wise, old-fashioned Jesuit philosophy professor at Boston College” and ‘Mother’, “a large, hospitable, bread-baking lady who wears bright dresses, has a parrot on her shoulder and holds continents of common sense in her brain”.
BAJ noticeably differs from Kreeft’s other dialogues in that it resembles a novel (“novelized dialogue”) — even though Kreeft tells us it is not intended to be, p. 14 — whereas his past efforts strictly follow the ‘Socratic dialogue’ format. As BAJ is the result of Kreeft’s yet to be released novel, An Ocean Full of Angels, his worry at the outset of the book is that, “without the novel to frame them, the characters in this book are bound to be somewhat thin and flat, even stereotyped” (p.14). A justified worry. Being familiar with some of these characters from Kreeft’s other novels (A Refutation of Moral Relativism had me thinking ‘Isa Ben Adams was much older than a student) I possess some background knowledge of the ‘key players’. I couldn’t imagine someone picking up this book with a fresh slate — with the exception of ‘Isa Ben Adams and ‘Mother’, the characters tend to be exactly as Kreeft worried, stereotypical.
This is not Kreeft at his best, but that does not mean that this is necessarily bad. BAJ is divided into 16 chapters, each dealing with loosely related topics. Chapter 3 addresses the differences between Jesus and Mohammad while chapter 7 addresses the question, “who goes to heaven?”. Chapter 12 address Islam and politics while chapter 16, abortion and compassion. I enjoyed chapter 16 most of all, and it is clear that this is an area Kreeft has dealt with extensively. Chapter 7 is perhaps the most important to Kreeft’s theses, and I’m not sure I completely understood what he was trying to say. Kreeft seems to be adopting a line of reasoning similar to the one proposed by Lewis in The Last Battle, where a person may be granted salvation provided they worship “God” according to the truth they have (p. 102–105). What made me most uncomfortable about this book, however, is what I took to be the repeated suggestion that whether one worships Yahweh, Jesus or Allah, they are worshiping the same God. Much like the in-book character Evan Jellema, I’m not sure if this is good theology or philosophy. Perhaps even more problematic, there seemed to be a superficiality about these dialogues that trivialized any of the serious theological issues between characters.
At the end of the day, BAJ simply isn’t on the same level as Kreeft’s other dialogues. BAJ presents an interesting concept, one which caught my attention, but not one that ultimately succeeds. If you’re a ‘fan’ of Peter Kreeft (I would consider myself such a person, and am patiently waiting for An Ocean full of Angels) and interested in what this book might provide, then go ahead and give it a read, it will be worth your time. Otherwise if you’re new to Peter Kreeft, I would recommend starting with one of his other books (such as Socrates Meets Jesus, Between Heaven and Hell, or The Unaborted Socrates).
Many thanks to the people at Intervarsity Press for providing a copy of this book for review purposes.
Related posts:
- Book Review: Socrates Meets Jesus by Peter Kreeft
- Book Review: Three Approaches to Abortion by Peter Kreeft
- Book Review: The Unaborted Socrates by Peter Kreeft
- Book Review: Making Sense of Suffering by Peter Kreeft
- Book Review: Between Heaven and Hell by Peter Kreeft


This is my reservation about Kreeft as well. I watched him debate an atheist where he said the atheist would be in heaven because he sincerely searches for truth. That’s a big put off for me.
Out of curiosity, are you able to link me to the debate? I think the line of thought is what Catholics call “innocent ignorance” — the idea that one who is searching for the truth, but unaware of Christ, is still ‘eligible’ for salvation by virtue of their commitment to ‘the truth’. I don’t know how Kreeft would apply it to the atheist, as the atheist has flatout rejected Christ. Perhaps he may argue that the atheist grew up in an atheistic home, or that he was misinformed when told about Christ? Either way, I find it interesting as speculation on the “what about those who haven’t heard?” question, but I can’t agree with practically.
Here’s the debate. It was against Michael Tooley.
http://catholicaudio.blogspot.com/2008/06/peter-kreeft-debate-atheism.html
It wasn’t much of a debate in my estimation and I think he says Tooley will be in heaven near the end if I remember correctly.
Thanks — I haven’t heard Kreeft debate before, so hopefully this is interesting.
I try to find this book in italian lenguage. You belive I can find it? (Exscuse me for my english) Thanks