Warning: include(/home/nascent/public_html/wp-content/themes/organic_structure/sidebar_left.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/nascent/public_html/wp-content/themes/organic_structure/archive.php on line 5

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/nascent/public_html/wp-content/themes/organic_structure/sidebar_left.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php') in /home/nascent/public_html/wp-content/themes/organic_structure/archive.php on line 5

Truth isn’t a club

While read­ing The Mak­ing of an Athe­ist I really started to think about what I’m going to call a “mis­ap­plied apolo­getic”. This is really just a nice way of describ­ing “apol­o­gists” who beat peo­ple over the head with “truth”–it hap­pens more than you think. It’s the sort of peo­ple that grab a hold of an idea, take it to be absolutely true (whether or not it is, though as far as they’re con­cerned, it is) and then pro­ceed to tell every­one else how wrong they are. I sup­pose, like me, they for­got to read the end of 1 Peter 3:15. Two exam­ples to illus­trate what I mean; one of these exam­ples is some­thing of an in-house apolo­getic issue–the ‘YEC / Evo­lu­tion’ debate. The other, is con­cern­ing a cer­tain peo­ple group which the church has grossly mishandled.

I learned a long time ago that it wasn’t worth my time to … (Read more)

Avatar, Pagan Advertisement?

It’s sur­pris­ing the things you’ll find on YouTube, and I mean that in a good way. (**Spoiler if you haven’t seen Avatar**)

I came across an excerpt from one of Mark Driscoll’s ser­mons (his most recent series on Luke) in which he gives a brief analy­sis of the ‘wildly pop­u­lar’ movie Avatar. This is Driscoll at his most can­did: Avatar is “the most demonic, Satanic film I’ve ever seen. How any Chris­t­ian could watch that with­out see­ing the overt demonism is beyond me”. Ouch. I have to say, though, that I agree with him. I ended up see­ing Avatar a few weeks after release (the only time I could get tick­ets), and the one thing that really both­ered me about the movie was the amount of reli­gious ani­mism. I won­der how many (Chris­tians) will com­pletely miss the world view being presented–that every­thing is inter­con­nected, divine, and that the … (Read more)

Musical musings

Whether I’m writ­ing an essay for school, or writ­ing new con­tent for here (well, or try­ing!) I almost always have some sort of music play­ing. I fig­ure it wouldn’t be fair of me to keep these artists to myself, as it were. So, I’m going to share a few with you all (before get­ting back to my new post for this evening). All of these artists are from Can­dyrat Records (YouTube chan­nel ‘rpoland’), the first three artists pri­mar­ily fin­ger pick, with the last (Stef­fen) play­ing some­thing very jazzy and highly rec­om­mended. If you like any of what fol­lows, check out their YouTube chan­nel as there is a lot of good talent there.

Don Ross — Tight Trite Night

Antoine Dufour — Ashes in the Sea

Don Ross and Andy McKee — Ebon Coast

Stef­fen Schackinger — City Lights

(Read more)

Book Review: The Making of an Atheist by James Spiegel

The Making of an Atheist

Pages: 130
Pub­lisher: Moody Pub­lish­ers
Year: 2010
Author: James S. Spiegel

I first heard of James Spiegel’s book while brows­ing the EPS blog (Evan­gel­i­cal Philo­soph­i­cal Soci­ety) and com­ing across an inter­view he had done with them. The con­cept of the book is fairly unique amidst the recent spat of new athe­ist books (and the­ist replies). Where those books tend to focus on the intel­lec­tual and ratio­nal rea­sons for dis­be­lief, Spiegel’s book pro­poses that this is more or less a smoke-screen; the real rea­sons for athe­ism are moral and psy­cho­log­i­cal, rather than intel­lec­tual and ratio­nal. This ques­tion, “why do peo­ple choose athe­ism / why are there athe­ists?” is what Spiegel sets out to answer (and, I think successfully).

The book itself is fairly short at only 130 pages (I spent a lit­tle over an hour read­ing it through). It’s stan­dard paper­back con­struc­tion and has a good feel to it. The pre­sen­ta­tion … (Read more)

McLaren, again?!

Well, I haven’t had the honor (if you can call it that) of read­ing Brian McLaren’s newest book (A New Kind of Chris­tian­ity), though from what I’ve heard it’s essen­tially a vin­di­ca­tion of every­one who believed(s?) McLaren to be teach­ing some very dan­ger­ous things (it might also cause some to recon­sider the ‘heat’ they sub­jected D.A. Car­son and oth­ers to). I recently came across a very good review of the book (and lengthy) from Kevin DeY­oung, co-author of Why We’re Not Emer­gent. If you still aren’t sure about McLaren it’s def­i­nitely worth the read, he’s even assem­bled it into .pdf format.

You can find the review on Kevin DeYoung’s blog.… (Read more)

Gentle, Reverent Answers

Dri­ving home from work yes­ter­day, our local Chris­t­ian radio sta­tion was broad­cast­ing a ser­mon by Dr. Adrian Rogers on 1 Peter 3:15, a text I’m quite famil­iar with: “but sanc­tify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to make a defense to every­one who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gen­tle­ness and rev­er­ence”. I’ll have to be com­pletely hon­est about that last part, the part that says “with gen­tle­ness and rev­er­ence,” I had never really paid much atten­tion to it until Rogers brought it up. For exam­ple, when I do quote 1 Peter 3:15 (which is quite often), I do so in the con­text of some dis­cus­sion on whether or not Chris­tians should engage in apolo­get­ics. What I end up quot­ing looks some­thing like this: “always being ready to make a defense to every­one who asks you … (Read more)

Book Review: How Should We Then Live? by Francis Schaeffer

How Should We Then Live.indd

Pages: 265
Pub­lisher: Cross­way
Year: 1976 (2005)
Author: Fran­cis Schaeffer

I wasn’t intro­duced to Fran­cis Scha­ef­fer until a few years ago, when on a par­tic­u­lar forum his name was brought up with a rec­om­men­da­tion to read the The Fran­cis Scha­ef­fer Tril­ogy, even­tu­ally lead­ing me to read How Should We Then Live? I sus­pect I’ll review the for­mer even­tu­ally, and prob­a­bly book by book, but need­less to say How Should We Then Live has been an invalu­able book, espe­cially in any course I’ve taken deal­ing with his­tory and mod­ern thought.

Schaeffer’s objec­tive in this book was to out­line how thought and idea shaped and molded cul­ture, from Rome all the way to our present day (or, rather, his present day), pre­sent­ing his­tory as a con­tin­u­ous and uni­fied flow. He then warns us where he sees our soci­ety head­ing and attempts to give us a solu­tion, a way to change course. … (Read more)

Schaeffer

I’ve been re-reading Fran­cis Schaeffer’s book How Should We Then Live in prepa­ra­tion for writ­ing a review.  While doing so I noticed that his video series (of the same title) had been uploaded to YouTube in it’s entirety. It’s def­i­nitely not HD qual­ity nor is it flashy, but it is worth watch­ing or given a chance for those who aren’t sure if they’re inter­ested. Scha­ef­fer was def­i­nitely unique in his abil­ity to present the sum of his­tory (up until his life time), show­ing how thoughts and world views impacted and shaped those cul­tures lead­ing up to our own. I only first heard of him a few years ago in the four or five of his books that I’ve read, I can eas­ily see why he’s highly regarded by Chris­t­ian aca­d­e­mics (even if they believe his analy­sis was flawed in this or that way).

(Read more)

Mystery and discontent

Over the course of this past week I had a dis­cus­sion with a friend who men­tioned that he noticed quite a few “well edu­cated” Chris­tians mov­ing from a Protes­tant foun­da­tion to a more “tra­di­tional” foun­da­tion, by which I mean Angli­can­ism and even the Roman Catholic Church. It strikes me as com­pa­ra­ble to — for instance — when a dis­grun­tled Evan­gel­i­cal chooses to iden­tify him­self as a mem­ber of the emer­gent church in response to a lack of authen­tic­ity in one’s faith (as I under­stand one of the major rea­sons peo­ple are part of the emer­gent church). At this point I agree with my friends obser­va­tion as I’ve had some expe­ri­ences with it myself; I would ask  why some of us are choos­ing to affil­i­ate with denom­i­na­tions (or here­sies, for those who are vehe­mently anti-Catholic) that in recent years have come to be frowned upon as need­lessly tra­di­tional, the­o­log­i­cally errant and … (Read more)

Denomination Wars

Effec­tively, there’s a very much down-played “civil war” hap­pen­ing (to a large degree) within Protes­tant Chris­tian­ity. I sus­pect, in fact, that many would rather just call it a slight annoy­ance, some­thing which given time will be remem­bered as noth­ing but a few dis­agree­ments. I don’t think this is the case at all, in fact, I think that if the cur­rent rifts (read: divi­sions) within Protes­tantism aren’t to a large part healed — though I don’t believe that means get­ting rid of dif­fer­ing denom­i­na­tions — then Protes­tantism will be it’s own death. While it prob­a­bly isn’t the best com­par­i­son, Luther’s recla­ma­tion of Scrip­ture has birthed its very own “mon­sters from the id” (from the sci­ence fic­tion novel For­bid­den Planet)–for all the work “we’ve” done, we’ve gone and destroyed ourselves.

The prob­lem, I think, is not so much that denom­i­na­tions exist as much as it is how most Chris­tians iden­tify them­selves, … (Read more)